Case Studies

Industry: High-tech & Pharmaceuticals

Client organizations: Two Fortune 100 firms: a producer of network computing devices and a pharmaceutical firm

Situation: Members of both client organizations used instant messaging extensively and claimed that it had significantly improved both individual and group productivity. The managers of a non-line division in each organization agreed to serve as a research site for an academic-quality study of their instant messaging use practices.

Approach: We interviewed 24 people, 12 from each organization, in their workspaces regarding their IM use. When participants received IMs during the interview, we asked them to respond as they would if they were in any work-related meeting and observed their practices. In addition to questions about their own use of IM, we also queried participants about how other members of their team used IM, intending to obtain a “360 degree”-type perspective on each user’s practices.

Findings: There were several key findings:

  1. IM use practices were very idiosyncratic, with each user developing their own ‘strategy’ for managing the pace and volume of interactions.
  2. The benefits of IM use were often asymmetric—people requesting information felt more productive as a result of having fast access to information; lower status employees who typically provided the information found IM to be disruptive, hindering their own productivity.
  3.  Use of IM helped people maintain ‘loose ties’ with coworkers who rotated out of a division or off a project, making people feel more connected, but at the same time resulted in many people interacting less with physically-adjacent coworkers, creating a simultaneous feeling of isolation.
  4. Use of IM during meetings was perceived to speed decision-making, by quickly accessing information from anywhere in the organization, but potentially decreased decision-quality by truncating the period of deliberation

Impact: To our knowledge, neither organization altered their IM use practices or policies. Within a couple years following the publication of two papers resulting from this study, representatives from high-tech firms, academia, and consulting agencies formed a consortium to explore information overload and pare down the reliance on electronic communication in their own firms, affirming our findings that electronic communication is not without cost.

{ 0 comments }

Industry: Energy—Deepwater petroleum production

Client organization: A Fortune 100 multi-national petroleum producer

Situation: A deepwater oil platform had been installed in a new oil “field” using a management structure new to the oil industry—self-directed work teams (SDWTs). The client wanted an independent third party to document the effectiveness of the organizational design, to summarize lessons learned across the work teams, and to identify opportunities for improving/refining the design.

Approach: Ethnography—a researcher lived on the platform 24 hours-a-day for two one-week stays, separated by two weeks off the platform, replicating the crew members’ schedule. Time on the platform was spent observing individuals and teams complete routine work, small and large team meetings and decision-making, and interactions between teams responsible for managing different aspects of the platform’s operation. The researcher supplemented the observation data with one-on-one and small group interviews, card-sorting exercises, and questionnaires.

Findings: The key finding was that each team’s interpretation and enactment of the “Principles and Guidelines for Effective Teams” that had been part of every employee’s training had been strongly shaped by their respective work responsibilities. Whether the workflow was episodic or continual, required individual v. cooperative activity, or involved only internal employees versus outside contractors, all dramatically impacted each team’s perception of what constituted a “good” team, what it meant to do teamwork “correctly,” and the behaviors perceived to support or inhibit team cohesion.

In addition, while the executives responsible for instituting self-directed work teams had anticipated that first line supervisors would be unsettled by a perceived loss of control, they had underestimated the impact of the change on the managers’ identities, resulting in most managers experiencing an extended period of “worthlessness.”

Finally, as has been documented in previous studies of self-directed work teams, lack of clarity on the boundaries of the workers’ autonomy resulted in frustration and dissatisfaction when the workers encountered limits to their self-determination.

Impact: The client organization intended to install one new deepwater platform per year using the same self-directed work team organization design. Our findings were used to modify their training practices and materials, both to allow for natural variations among teams and to clarify the boundaries of the teams’ authority.

{ 0 comments }

Competition Across Firm, Industry, and National Boundaries

Industry: Automotive

Client organization: Multi-organizational, multi-national team; academic community

Situation: Automotive designers were being constrained by the limits of the traditional automotive battery technology. A significant change would be too costly for any one company to bear, so an industry-wide …

Read the full article

Categories: Automotive, Case Studies, Organizational Insights

Understanding Complex User Needs through Alpha-version Feedback

Industry: High-tech—Software development

Client organization: A U.S.-based software start-up

Situation: A start-up firm with deep domain knowledge knew their product was addressing an important industry need, but they needed feedback and guidance on the product’s basic usability, resonance with the …

Read the full article

Categories: Case Studies, Customer Insights, High-Tech, Software Development