Industry: High-tech & Pharmaceuticals
Client organizations: Two Fortune 100 firms: a producer of network computing devices and a pharmaceutical firm
Situation: Members of both client organizations used instant messaging extensively and claimed that it had significantly improved both individual and group productivity. The managers of a non-line division in each organization agreed to serve as a research site for an academic-quality study of their instant messaging use practices.
Approach: We interviewed 24 people, 12 from each organization, in their workspaces regarding their IM use. When participants received IMs during the interview, we asked them to respond as they would if they were in any work-related meeting and observed their practices. In addition to questions about their own use of IM, we also queried participants about how other members of their team used IM, intending to obtain a “360 degree”-type perspective on each user’s practices.
Findings: There were several key findings:
- IM use practices were very idiosyncratic, with each user developing their own ‘strategy’ for managing the pace and volume of interactions.
- The benefits of IM use were often asymmetric—people requesting information felt more productive as a result of having fast access to information; lower status employees who typically provided the information found IM to be disruptive, hindering their own productivity.
- Use of IM helped people maintain ‘loose ties’ with coworkers who rotated out of a division or off a project, making people feel more connected, but at the same time resulted in many people interacting less with physically-adjacent coworkers, creating a simultaneous feeling of isolation.
- Use of IM during meetings was perceived to speed decision-making, by quickly accessing information from anywhere in the organization, but potentially decreased decision-quality by truncating the period of deliberation
Impact: To our knowledge, neither organization altered their IM use practices or policies. Within a couple years following the publication of two papers resulting from this study, representatives from high-tech firms, academia, and consulting agencies formed a consortium to explore information overload and pare down the reliance on electronic communication in their own firms, affirming our findings that electronic communication is not without cost.
{ 0 comments }